|
Regions of the U.K.
Region 1: Scotland and Borders Hunt territory for Lauderdale hunt
Region 2: North England and Northern Ireland
Region 3: Midlands and North Wales
Region 4: South Wales and Southwest England
Region 5: Southeast England and Isle of Wight
|
|
Numerous small packs of hounds were kept by people in all walks of life, as they rambled through the countryside pursuing their quarry. From Tudor times the culling of vermin was subsidised through bounty schemes administered parish by parish. The bounty on foxes was often twelve times that on other species, and until the late-seventeenth century most fox-hunting was for pest control. Even in the 1760s informal town packs, or 'town cry', were still billeted among the community in 'babs'. Hounds were fed horseflesh and collected on hunt days with the sound of a horn in the street. People then hunted in earlier hours to suit the fox's nocturnal nature, horses and hounds were slower, and distances were longer.
As deer and other game populations dwindled, so the sport of formal fox-hunting became increasingly popular. Scientific breeding of hounds, knowledge of scent, and increased speeds were cultivated. Private, exclusive hunts invited privileged guests to accompany hounds and hunt servants. Horses were usually provided and no charges were made. The patronage system worked well, that is until agricultural prices waned and money became tight.
Subscription hunts were formed, beginning in the mid-eighteenth century, and an annual fee was charged as a contribution towards hunt expenses, though generally the Master of Foxhounds shouldered the majority of expenses, needing deep pockets to warrant his title. The Master oversaw the training and rearing of hounds, maintained the skills necessary for the chase, entertained and gained the respect of the field. Guests were occasionally invited to subscription packs, and capping, or the daily charge for non-subscribers, was not prevalent until the end of the nineteenth century. It was not until 1893, for example, that a Northamptonshire hunt began charging 2 [pounds sterling] per day--for non-members.
The Charlton Hunt was an early formal fox-hunt, dating to 1732 and its members hunted south of the Thames, whilst the Berkeley Hunt (with kennels at Charing Cross, Ascot and Berkeley Castle) hunted north of the river. By 1750 the Badminton and Belvoir hunts switched from deer to fox. At the end of the eighteenth century at least twelve major subscription fox-hunts existed. Hugo Meynell and Ralph Lampton established Melton Mowbray and the Quorn and Cottesmore hunts as the elite centres for fox-hunting. Each member required seven or eight horses, costing about 1,000 guineas (1,050 [pounds sterling]) each, some three times the value of the average hunter. This elite crowd maintained themselves in style, tending to ride hard during the day and giving rise to the expression 'painting the town red' at night.
The financing of subscription hunts was composed of two facets. The hunt paid the Master a set fee per annum and incurred ancillary expenses of an indirect nature. The Master undertook full financial responsibility for the hounds, paid hunt servant wages, accommodation, horses and clothing for up to two whipper-ins, a kennel feeder and several kennelsmen.
Hunting was certainly not cheap: in 1771, for example, a Cottesmore subscriber contributed 1,400 guineas per year while the huntsman was just paid 35 [pounds sterling] annually, an average wage for semi-skilled service. Subscriptions varied enormously and the Hampshire Hunt Club, formed in 1795, charged its twenty-five members 25 guineas annually. At this time, domestic or outdoor employees were paid around 10 [pounds sterling] per year (excluding keep) and small squires earned from 100 [pounds sterling] to 300 [pounds sterling], so only the select few could afford the sport. A typical annual subscription fee of 2,000 [pounds sterling] today is relatively less expensive.
A handful of aristocrats might agree to even higher subscription fees. One such was the Duke of Wellington, who in 1878 contributed a subscription of 100 [pounds sterling], though bitterly complaining that he was paying nearly twice as much as those (including Lord Portsmouth) considerably richer than himself. They were also called upon when deeper financial troubles arose. The Master, however, met the bulk of expenses and enjoyed the admiration of well turned-out liveried hunt staff complete with matching coloured coats, insignia buttons, and Napoleon-style top boots.
In the late eighteenth century, a hunt that turned out twice a week and maintained twenty-five couple (fifty) of hounds and six horses incurred annual expenses of at least 1,000 [pounds sterling]. In 1793 three months' hunt wages and the expenses of whippers-in, helpers, hounds and horses kept at Gerrards Cross totalled about 200 [pounds sterling], roughly 53,800 [pounds sterling] a year in today's money. These costs were besides incidentals, such as those found in a 1790 bill sent from Richard Lane to Earl Spencer for twelve breakfasts (12s), the laying of 14 fires (14s), and thirty-three days' supply offish totalling 1 13s [pounds sterling] 0d.
"Hunt stables was also costly. The Oakley Hunt dates to 1793 when the 4th Duke of Bedford, one of the wealthiest landlords in the country, established a pack of hounds at Woburn Abbey and stables were built to accommodate thirty-six hunters. Both horses and hounds had central heating by flues and the dog kennel alone measured 405 feet long with numerous separate compartments for bitches, puppies and dogs. There were seven hospital rooms dedicated to sick hounds, a handsome house for the huntsman, and apartments for the two kennel keepers. One of the first covered riding schools was also erected. Even during the summer, seventy couple of hounds were fed upon flesh and oatmeal on benches topped with straw.
Many extravagant Georgian and Victorian hunt stables were built. Chatsworth, Dunster Castle, Seaton Delaval, Latham Hall (Lancashire), Moor Park (Hertfordshire), Belford Hall (Northumberland), Tredegar House (Newport, Gwent), Goodwood House (West Sussex) all have grand fox-hunting stables. In 1804 stables for William Porden at the Royal Pavilion in Brighton cost 80,000 [pounds sterling], one of the most expensive. A more modest yard built in 1865 (twenty-four stalls, four looseboxes, and ten servants' rooms) cost 3,460 [pounds sterling] at a time when a small terraced house cost just 100 [pounds sterling].
Yet by the end of the eighteenth century, fox-hunting was feeling the pinch of costs. The Napoleonic Wars brought heavy taxes and the Duke of Bedford, with his Oakley hounds, was taxed on an additional twenty-five more servants and twenty-seven more horses on top of an existing twenty-six servants and thirty horses. On March 20th, 1798, the Duke wrote to Samuel Whitbread: 'I will continue my subscription of 500 [pounds sterling] so long as the hounds are kept at Oakley and Mr Pitt leaves me the money'. Difficulties ensued, and in 1809 the Duke of Bedford's eldest son rescued the hunt when the expense of the hounds totalled 2,850 [pounds sterling] per year. 'You will be glad to hear Tavistock has determined to undertake the arduous task,' the Duke wrote on April 4th, 'although it is rather hard on him to exact the sacrifice of half his income for the gratification of a few gentlemen who are unwilling to contribute anything towards their own amusement.
Organised fox-hunting expanded in the nineteenth century, however, and the golden age of coaching, from 1825 to 1845, is regarded as the height of fashionable foxhunting. If anything, fox-hunting became more expensive, and one estimate in 1825 puts the costs of hunting in provincial country for four days a week at 1,825 [pounds sterling], while that lot the extravagant shires totalled anything between 4,000 [pounds sterling] and 6,000 [pounds sterling].
The hounds themselves were a considerable financial burden. A sum of 20 [pounds sterling] for a single hound in Shakespeare's time (and not the best in pack either) was a significant figure. In the early 1800s, however, a pack of foxhounds at 1,000 [pounds sterling]-1,200 [pounds sterling] was cheap. Around the middle of the nineteenth century, when the Master of the Hampshire Hunt, Mr Villebois, died, the hunt purchased his pack of foxhounds, horses, saddlery and equipment needed to hunt for three days a week for 3,550 [pounds sterling] 16s 4d--at a time when their subscription fee was 10 [pounds sterling]. This was at a time when the average skilled London artisan earned about 78 [pounds sterling] per annum and net national income per head averaged 20 [pounds sterling]. In 1842 a notorious sale of hounds occurred when Mr Combe sold hounds at Tattersalls for 6,511 guineas.
Usually the Master had his own hounds, and agreements were drawn up with the hunt indicating to whom the hounds and their offspring actually belonged. Many hunts, however, rapidly adopted a policy that hounds were the property of the sporting public, in order to avoid inconsistent breeding and new packs coming and going as Masterships changed.
Masterships could be delicate positions. If the field of subscribers wished the Master to hire a professional huntsman and not hunt the country himself, this more than likely resulted in his resignation, or in one case almost in a pistol duel. Ill 1831, for example, Lord Berkeley resigned as Master from the Oakley Hunt when asked to hire a huntsman. Masters incurred constant criticism and one creative solution, found by Sir Richard Sutton (who had the Quorn from 1847 to 1856), was to sack his subscribers and hunt the country at his own expense, with satisfaction to everyone. Richard Sutton admitted that one year's expense amounted to 12,000 [pounds sterling].
Master of Hounds often were the bumbling 'Jorrocks type' (the original being a butcher by trade); they often came into the hunt when no one else could be found and met their costs by dealing in horses. Anthony Trollope described the position as 'thankless, ill paid, and closely watched'. Each hunt became impressed by the particular qualities of the Master. Some were autocratic, others eccentric, many magnanimous, and others notably stingy. Although the Master received annual contracts of 1,000 [pounds sterling] to 2,000 [pounds sterling], Trollope estimated 500 [pounds sterling] per hunting day was needed for a Master to break even.
Despite the strong demand for fox-hunting in the Victorian age, subscription rates remained relatively static and throughout the nineteenth century total subscription revenues for many county hunts grew only slightly, even during buoyant times when the magazine press promoted fox-hunting for social reasons. New hunts were established as older hunts either could not or would not accommodate newcomers. However, hunt accounts reveal that fox-hunting was never more than marginally profitable, even on a good day when 300-400 might show up. It is not clear whether the Master pocketed various monies, though none of the Master agreements indicate such an arrangement.
Victorian subscription fees also varied, as did numbers of subscribers. In the 1862-63 season, the Old Berkley Hunt had 89 subscribers and total subscription fees of 2,143 [pounds sterling] 10s 0d, while the Craven Hunt consistently averaged 1,000 [pounds sterling] subscription fees per annum from 1830 to 1873. By the late 1880s the Pytchley Hunt (established in 1755) had 99 subscribers with total fees amounting to 4,110 [pounds sterling] 10s 0d. If royalty were expected to attend, people flocked to hunt. For example, during the Pytchley's 1877-78 season, rumours that the Countess of Austria was attending a meet encouraged 500 riders to enter the field.
Various estimates have been made of the total numbers of people hunting. Colonel Cook (born in 1773) moderately estimated that 10,000 people hunted constantly throughout season with fox-hounds only. Historian David Itzkowitz has reckoned that there were about 50,000 people riding to hounds during 1885. His optimistic calculation was based on an average of 150 riders per meet, 150 packs of bounds, and that people hunted twice a week.
A day's fox-hunting was a full day's occupation either in the saddle or travelling to a meet. The horsebox was not widely available until the 1930s. For the dedicated enthusiast, fox-hunting was a huge commitment and not only did the Master fork out tremendous sums, but serious fox-hunters needed private incomes to afford the time to hunt. Tailors were engaged, boots commissioned, and saddles and bridles made and repaired. Hunts took their toll on animals too. The Master rode five horses in the famous 'Waterloo run' on February 2nd, 1866, with the Pytchley Hunt. This lasted three hours and forty-five minutes and covered twenty-one miles: several horses were seriously injured and destroyed during it. In addition, hounds could go missing or contract distemper or rabies.
The enormous economic and technological changes of the nineteenth century impinged on the character of foxhunting. The Enclosure Acts of 1801 and 1836, for instance, increased the planting of hedges, thus leading to more jumping in the field. The agricultural depression later in the century had a more serious impact on foxhunting, threatening a traditional way of life and, with it, the prosperity of the landed classes.
The nineteenth century had begun with wheat prices, kept artificially high by protective legislation, at 113s 10d per imperial quarter. Yet by 1849, following the repeal of the Corn Laws, prices slid to 44s 3d, followed by a further decrease to 32 s 10d by 1885. In 1899, at the end of the century, wheat raised no more than 25s 8d. Meanwhile, agriculture as a percentage of total net national income, which was 15.7 per cent in 1867-74, halved by 1899, while industrial production grew by leaps and bounds. It was said that new industrialists bought themselves into the upper classes and took tap field sports, but cavalry, officers certainly sustained fox-hunting too, possibly as a hardening practice for war and undoubtedly as a social outlet.
Despite declining agricultural wealth, the number of foxes required for hunting soared. By 1860, one third more foxes and double the amount of land was needed for the same number of days hunted, compared to the previous century, according to an anonymous Hampshire huntsman writing at the time. More people were hunting--one suggestion being that unlike France or Germany, British hunts were never entirely aristocratic. Also the character of the hounds required more 'blooding' to remain motivated. Increased acreage was due not only to railways but increasing boundary disputes between hunts making the hunting of more acres of less agreeable land a necessity.
Recent debates on fox-hunting have unearthed deep-rooted prejudices going back centuries, some of them relating to discriminatory poaching laws, repression, and now intolerable social behaviour. There are many misconceptions on both sides and fox-hunting makes an interesting study of prejudice and image. It has also been seen as a social barometer, adapting to changing fortunes and social structure. Despite the possibility of fewer archetypal participants, it retained its unique language, customs and powerful Lordship 'Master' figure.
COPYRIGHT 2003 History Today Ltd.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Gale Group
|
|
There are 174 MFHA recognized hunts in the U.K. Those listed below are some of the most notable ones as far as Russell bloodlines are concerned or are some of the older hunts established in or prior to the 1800s.
Avon Vale Hunt
Hunt Country
The Hunt enjoys great support in North Wiltshire and has very good relations with all
its neighbouring Hunts. It is not a grand Hunt and is very much a farmers and local pack.
Hunt History
Berkeley Hunt
Hunt Country
Hunt History
Old Berkshire Hunt
Hunt Country
Hunt History
Duke of Beaufort’s Hunt
Hunt Country
Hunt History
Dukes of Beaufort have either hunted hounds themselves or have been in the Mastership since the title was created in 1682 and the hounds, kennels and stables still belong to them. The 10th Duke was master from 1924 to 1984 and so great was his contribution to foxhunting he became universally known as "Master". The Beaufort is one of the few remaining private packs although it is basically financed by subscription.
The hunt dress is peculiar to the country in that the Huntsman and Whippers-In wear green and the subscribers a bluecoat with buff facings - the Beaufort Liveries.
Belvoir Hunt
Hunt Country
Hunt History
Bicester Hunt
Hunt Country
Hunt History
Cattistock Hunt
Hunt Country
Hunt History
Cotswold Hunt
Hunt Country
Hunt History
The Adjacent Hunts are North Cotswold, Cotswold Vale Farmers, Heythrop and
Vale of White Horse.
David Davies Hunt
Hunt Country
Hunt History
The first Lord Davies died in 1944, and his eldest son was killed in action a few months later. At the end of the War, the Hunt was reorganised under the Mastership of Henrietta, Lady Davies, as a subscription pack, with a committee under the Chairmanship of Charles James.
Essex Hunt
Hunt Country
Adjoining Hunts: the Cambridgeshire with Enfield Chase to the south west; the Puckeridge to the west; the Thurlow to the north; the East Essex to the east; and the Essex Farmers & Union to the South.
Hunt History
East Essex Hunt
Hunt Country
Adjoining Hunts: to the west the Essex; to the north west the Thurlow; to the north east the Suffolk; to the east the Essex and Suffolk; and the south the Essex Farmers and Union.
Hunt History
Exmoor Hunt
Hunt Country
Grove and Rufford Hunt
Hunt Country
Hunt History
The Rufford country with Lord Harrington's formed part of the tract hunted by the 4th Earl of Lincoln in 1667. Lord Castleton hunted it in 1709, as also did Lord Scarbrough and Mr. F. Foljambe after him.
Heythrop Hunt
Hunt Country
Hunt History
Lauderdale Hunt
Hunt Country
Meynell and South Staffordshire Hunt
Hunt Country
Hunt History
Monmouthshire Hunt
Hunt Country
Hunt History
The Monmouthshire Hunt Club was established about 1835. The Hunt Club ceased to run the Hunt in 1945, since when control has been vested in a Committee of farmers and representatives of the Hunt Club.
Morpeth Hunt
Hunt Country
Hunt History
Oakley Hunt
Hunt Country
Adjoining Hunts: to the west the Bicester with Whaddon Chase and the Grafton; to the north west the Pytchley; to the north the Woodland Pytchley and the Fitzwilliam; to the east the Cambridgeshire with Enfield Chace; and to the south the Vale of Aylesbury with Garth and South Berks.
Hunt History
Vale of White Horse Hunt
Hunt Country
Adjoining Hunts: the Cotswold, Heythrop, Old Berkshire, Vine and Craven and Duke of Beaufort's.
Hunt History
Warwickshire Hunt
Hunt Country
Adjacent hunts are the Heythrop and North Cotswold to the south and south-west; the Biscester with Whaddon Chase to the east; the Pytchley to the north; the Worcesershire and Croome & West Warwickshire to the west.
Hunt History
The halcyon days for the Warwickshire were between the first and second World Wars. Very much recognised as one of the leading "Shires" packs, it had a succession of legendary huntsmen including Bob Champion, Ted Cox and George Gillson.
From 1853 - 1985, the north part of the country was hunted by the North Warwickshire Hunt. Encroaching urbanisation forced this hunt to disband in 1985 whereupon some of the country was returned to the Warwickshire with the remainder being dispersed between the Worcestershire and the Croome & West Warwickshire Hunts.
West Somerset Vale Hunt
Hunt Country
Adjoining Hunts: the West Somerset, the Taunton Vale, the Mendip Farmers, the Weston and Banwell and the Taunton Vale Harriers. To the north lies the sea.
Wheatland Hunt
Hunt Country
Hunt History
In 1903 the hounds were moved from Monkhopton to new kennels at Cleobury North. The kennels were moved by Mr. Buston from Cleobury North to Eardington in June 1919, at his own expense. He presented them to the country. |